Saturday, October 29, 2011
Module 4 Video Presentation Update
See Module 4 Presentation Update at the following link: http://educ7101-diffusion.wikispaces.com/Tawana+Stiff
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Module 4
Module 4 BLOG Post by Tawana Stiff
Please See the following Graphic Organizer at the following Link: http://educ7101-diffusion.wikispaces.com/Tawana+Stiff
Reflection on Module 4 Graphic Organizer: Online learning environments are just as effective as face-to-face environments when there is a balance between all of the key components. As I indicated in my Module 4 Discussion post, Anderson's 'Community of Inquiry' Model (2008) suggests that there are 3 components necessary to facilitate an effective online learning environment: social presence, cognitive presence and teaching presence. By creating these presences in an online learning environment, facilitators are not only setting the stage for success; but are also leading students to take technological tools used in their everyday lives and apply them to classroom experiences. For example, if an online instructor aspires to establish cognitive presence and build the content knowledge of his students, he can provide them with a multitude of resources. These resources can be hardcover textbooks or they can be e-books that the students can access on their e-readers, tablets, or even cell phones. In addition, course videos that were once only available on a dvd, are now available as a podcast - - which can be uploaded and played on an ipod. The advantage to being able to access a multitude of resources on various technological devices is that it allows students to take everyday technologies -- like readers, tablets, cell phones and ipods, and use them to access online professional development and content related information. While meanwhile, the instructor is simply the concierge, or guide that directs the students to these valuable learning resources.
To enhance the student communication, the online instructor must establish a social presence in which the students feel comfortable sharing their thoughts with one another. There are many ways in which this collaboration can take place. Within the online classroom structure, there can be a common meeting place established for all the students. This can be in the form of a classroom café or discussion forum. And just as students may share their thoughts on everyday controversies or topics of interest in general, they may also participate in a blog site or wiki page for the same purpose regarding their course topics instead. In addition, students may use common social networks or interactive video tools such as skype to communicate with online colleagues as well.
Last, online instructors must facilitate authentic learning experiences to ensure their students reach their ultimate goal of acquiring new knowledge for the purpose of learning. So rather than placing the emphasis on the instructor, the facilitator may wish to create a student centered environment in which students focus on their role as individuals and as members within a learning community. By establishing such communities, the facilitator is encouraging the students to take accountability and ownership over their own learning. In this sense, the facilitator acts as a guide by creating the guidelines or path; But it is the learner who constructs the knowledge by creating the experience or the collaborative discourse that yields new knowledge (Siemens 2008).
References
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190−193.
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITForum.
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190−193.
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITForum.
Saturday, October 8, 2011
Module 3
Participation in collaborative environments should be addressed in a way where members feel valued as both individuals and contributors in a group. To effectively do this, Dr. Siemen's (2008) suggests that community members be provided with opportunities to role-play so they can gain an appreciation and understanding of how indivuals effect the productivity and effectiveness of the group as a whole. Moreover, the assessments must also be done in an effective manner that coincides with the shift from focusing on individual students to focusing on a collaborative community of students.
To ensure that assessments are fair and equitable within a diverse body of students with varying skill levels, it is important that the focus is on growth and development. For example, Dr. Siemen's suggest looking at where the student was and where they are now (2008). In doing this, the online facilitator or instructor is looking at the students growth and development in terms of their contributions. Questions that might arise are 'Did the student complete the assigned task?' and 'Did the student complete the task to the best of his or her ability?' and 'What evidence is there that the student has grown in his or her ability between this previous task and the current task?' By basing assessments on growth and effort in lieu of how the student compares to the other members of the group, there is acknowledgement and embracement of the fact that all students are not going to start at the same place with the same knowledge base; and therefore, cannot be expected to end up at the same place with the same level of skills. So although collaboration happens within a group, the role of the instructor is to ensure that fair and equitable assessments focus on the degree to which the individual contributions align with the individual abilities within the group.
In addition to the role of the instructor in assessment, the members in the collaborative community also have a role in assessment of each other. To set the stage for online learning, Palloff and Pratt (2005) suggests parameters and guidelines for participation be estabilished. If members of the group are not participating to the agreed upon standards, then it is up to the group to decide how those non-collaborative members should be handled. In my learning community, we have all agreed that if a member is not adhering to our group procedures, we will address them as a community prior to involving the instructor. However, this may vary from group to group or in different collaborative settings.
Resources
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Assessment of collaborative learning. Baltimore: MD, Author.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
To ensure that assessments are fair and equitable within a diverse body of students with varying skill levels, it is important that the focus is on growth and development. For example, Dr. Siemen's suggest looking at where the student was and where they are now (2008). In doing this, the online facilitator or instructor is looking at the students growth and development in terms of their contributions. Questions that might arise are 'Did the student complete the assigned task?' and 'Did the student complete the task to the best of his or her ability?' and 'What evidence is there that the student has grown in his or her ability between this previous task and the current task?' By basing assessments on growth and effort in lieu of how the student compares to the other members of the group, there is acknowledgement and embracement of the fact that all students are not going to start at the same place with the same knowledge base; and therefore, cannot be expected to end up at the same place with the same level of skills. So although collaboration happens within a group, the role of the instructor is to ensure that fair and equitable assessments focus on the degree to which the individual contributions align with the individual abilities within the group.
In addition to the role of the instructor in assessment, the members in the collaborative community also have a role in assessment of each other. To set the stage for online learning, Palloff and Pratt (2005) suggests parameters and guidelines for participation be estabilished. If members of the group are not participating to the agreed upon standards, then it is up to the group to decide how those non-collaborative members should be handled. In my learning community, we have all agreed that if a member is not adhering to our group procedures, we will address them as a community prior to involving the instructor. However, this may vary from group to group or in different collaborative settings.
Resources
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Assessment of collaborative learning. Baltimore: MD, Author.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Module 3: Virtual World Storyboard
To view my EDUC 7102-3 Module 3 Blog Post: Storyboard on Virtual World Multi-Media Presentation, Please click on the following link: http://educ7101-diffusion.wikispaces.com/Tawana+Stiff
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)